|
Interview
with Dead Kennedys' Klaus Fluoride
Klaus talks about the Dead Kennedys reunion controversy
and his take on politics in America.
by Mark Prindle
In addition to creating three terrific avant-garde
pop records called Cha Cha Cha With Mr. Flouride, Because
I Say So and The Light Is Flickering, Klaus Flouride
is the bass player for the Dead Kennedys, one of the greatest-ever
hardcore bands EVER!! GREATEST!!!
He brought more than a bottom-end to the band --
he brought a loose, thwopping, extremely intelligent and melodic
counter-force to East Bay Ray's surfy guitar licking. Although the
band broke up in 1986 after releasing Bedtime For Democracy
(or DID they? Read on to find out!), Klaus, Ray, and drummer Darren
Peligro reunited about a year and a half ago and have been playing
concerts aplenty all over creation.
One element is missing from these reunion shows,
though: punk rock/spoken word legend icon Jello Biafra, with
whom the three other members have had numerous legal run-ins over
the past few years. For Biafra's side of the story, read alternativetentacles.com;
for the DK's side, check deadkennedys.com.
One day in mid-September 1st, through a prearranged
hostage bargain deal, I was given the opportunity to interview Klaus
Flouride via telephone. Although I paid close attention and Linda
Tripp-ed our conversation, Klaus talked more quietly than any mammal
in recorded history, so I was forced to jettison some of his comments
due to tape static inaudibility issues (which is a shame, because
he totally told me who killed Kennedy, and now I can't remember).
The general gist of his answers are here though, and that's more
than you've managed.
AT LEAST I FUCKIN' TRY!!! WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU
DONE??? I feel it's important to quote Minor Threat when introducing
an interview with a member of the Dead Kennedys.
My questions are so bold, you'll shit yourself.
Klaus's answers are so plain text, you'll suck the shit back
up into your large intestine.
-----
Okay, just to tell you where I stand on this
-- I've been a huge Dead Kennedys fan since I was about 15, which
was about 15 years ago. And when you're that age, you tend to be
influenced by the squeakiest wheel, I guess. So at that age, I was
of course really into Jello Biafra and everything he said. I thought
he was the best. But as the years went by, I don't know, you kinda
start to see what people are really like. So at this point, I'm
definitely for you guys basically. Did he purposely not give you
the money, or did it just sort of slip his mind, or what the heck?
You know what? He had a lot to do with the running
of the company. I am not sure whether he set up -- we never established
a record deal. He set it up or one of his managers set it up. So
he may have just taken some bad advice basically. But the thing
he did that made it wrong was that he was informed by one of the
managers at Alternative Tentacles who noticed that it was going
on, and he said, "Cover it up. Don't tell Ray or he'll throw
a fit." And at that point, it became a cover-up situation and
he wouldn't come out and admit that he was wrong, so he just got
himself dug in deeper and deeper. And I think a lot of it may have
been bad advice, but I'm not sure.
But we tried for a year and a half to negotiate,
and the negotiations -- I can't talk specifically about the negotiations
because I'm barred from doing so -- but they offered something that
we'd kinda have to have been chumps to take. Their offer didn't
come close to making things right. So it became kind of a reality
check for us, a reality check for him, and a reality check for some
other people who were involved in stuff outside of the Dead Kennedys.
Well, it's a drag. It's cost us the friendship and it's made our
lives no fun. The situation you were talking about before with the
squeaky wheel - that's also been a problem all along
(mumble
mumble fade)
What's that? Sorry, you're fading a little on
the phone.
Oh I'm sorry. Are you taping this, by the way?
Yeah, is that okay?
That's actually better.
Yeah, okay. If you could keep your voice up,
so my recorder can get it
Yeah, sorry about that.
Oh, that's fine!
It was a matter of what we thought was shoddy journalism,
where people would take his side of the story because they didn't
want to lose his soundbites. He's a professional soundbite artist.
But what is his reality at this point? Is he
so stuck in this image that he created for himself that he's not
even a real person anymore? What is he thinking?
I'm not inside his skin; I can't say what he's feeling.
I know he has a hard time accepting situations that he may have
caused to go awry. But I'm not gonna try to be his psychologist.
Why did the band originally break up? All I've
ever heard is that the Frankenchrist trial was so stressful
that --
Yeah, that is a myth that has been perpetuated by
Alternative Tentacles from the beginning, no matter how many times
we've told the true story. The group broke up -- the Frankenchrist
thing was, say, a final straw as far as his going in a different
direction than what we wanted to do. I felt that the poster itself
was shock for the sake of shock value. We'd shocked people before,
but we'd always tried to have a point behind it. I didn't see the
point he was making.
But we didn't quit after the lawsuit happened. We
quit when he decided that that poster was gonna be in there one
way or the other, and we could take a hike if we wanted to. So we
said, "Well, why don't we call it 'Jello Biafra and Dead Kennedys'?"
since that's what it was becoming anyway at that point. We'd been
together for eight years at that point, and we thought it was time
to take a break.
Things were getting -- the recording process more
and more came to lose the feeling of spontaneity, and I wanted to
do some different types of music and Ray did too. So we dissolved
it before Frankenchrist was released. We didn't dissolve
the partnership, just the band. We decided to finish out what commitments
we already had to each other and to other people -- to record another
album we'd written (Bedtime for Democracy) and tour. We did
that. And then the lawsuit came down. But that's not what broke
the group up.
Did he sort of develop an ego over the years?
Or he just went a different direction about wanting to be more and
more political?
I think anybody in this business gets an ego --
I have an ego! I mean, anybody when they get on stage and have people
cheering for them, they kinda have to develop an ego to function!
Any performer. He certainly wasn't the same person leaving the group
that he was going into it, but then I can't say that I was either.
It was a learning experience for all of us. He definitely got much
more dug into it.
Did your friendship remain? Because I have your
three solo records, and they were all on Alternative Tentacles,
right?
Yeah, yeah. We were still -- the funny thing was
that my solo stuff, Ray's solo stuff, DH's solo stuff -- there were
no problems with the royalties from those records. It was only on
the Dead Kennedys material that royalties were being withheld from
us. Because that's where the money was.
What made you decide to go ahead and you three
get back together and play some?
It was originally DH's idea. He decided that if
we were going to go through this long lawsuit process, we should
at least get together and play music together, especially since
we were seeing each other every day in court. It was at first meant
to just be a one-off show, but it was so much fun, and the crowd
enjoyed it so much, that we decided to take some time off from our
"regular lives" and book a tour. We played a lot of shows,
for about a year and a half.
Yeah, I saw all those tour dates on your web
site. You kept busy!
Yeah! It sort of interrupted the lives we had going
on at the time, but so did the trial. Right now we're taking a break.
Are you back at work doing what you were before?
I've always been recording and playing bass with
other people. Right now, I'm trying to move, which is a bit difficult.
Where you going?
Oh, just a new place. I'm staying in the Bay Area.
Is there any chance you guys would consider doing
a new studio album? Or at least a live album with the current line-up?
There's stuff coming up. There's another live project
from when the Dead Kennedys had five people in the band.
Oh wow!
That should be out around probably January. And
the idea has occurred to us to record some new material together.
But the main problem with that is that, even when Jello was in the
band, it would take us a year or a year and a half to come up with
new material for an album. And we've been touring nonstop since
we got back together. We haven't had time to sit down and develop
the new material. I've got some rough sketches and Ray's got some
sketches, so it's not out of the question.
But I know DH would like to get back with his band
Peligro, and I've had a lot of people asking me to put my solo records
back in print. I'm thinking of putting out a sort of retrospective
CD of released and unreleased material. I never toured for any of
those albums when they were released, but that was partly because
a lot of the material was so sort of studio-specific.
Exactly. Especially Because I Say So.
It'd be really hard to play that stuff live!
Yeah, I never wanted to change those songs so that
they'd be playable in a concert setting. I didn't want to lose the
flavor of what I was going for on the records.
Have you recorded any music -- I mean, I know
I saw that there's something called Jumbo Shrimp, but I can't seem
to find that CD anywhere.
That had a very limited run. I let that ball drop.
That was -- unfortunately, the people involved are scattered now.
We had three guitarists, and it was kind of a take-off on surf music.
We'd do surf versions of popular rock songs -- an REM song (which
REM actually saw us perform once). We'd do "Buddy Holly"
by Weezer and stuff like that. It was fun! Then we pressed up some
CDs and sold them around town. But it never had any sort of real
distribution. Aside from that, I've played with people like the
Legendary Stardust Cowboy --
Oh, you played with him?
Yeah, I've played bass with him for a few years
now.
Wow! Are you on that new live CD I keep seeing
everywhere?
Yep, I played on Live In Chicago. That was
actually recorded under the worst possible conditions. So instead
of trying to make it sound normal, we took a different direction
which was to make it sonically weird. But he would say, "Okay,
here's a song!" and start singing and we'd have to start playing
immediately -- and with luck, we'd get through one verse.
Is the CD worth getting? I didn't know you played
on it!
Yeah! It's fun, it's fun. I mean, if you like the
Ledge, you'd like it. And I've worked with some other people over
the years. Like Joe Pop-O-Pies.
Oh yeah? A friend of mine actually said he spoke
with you recently. Gregg Turkington?
Oh yeah, Gregg. It's funny; Gregg -- One of the
guitarists from Jumbo Shrimp played with Gregg in the Zip Code Rapists.
John Singer. Jumbo Shrimp also had a rotating sort of membership.
I think that Ray and I were the only ones to be in the band the
whole time. Yeah, Gregg -- just recently, we were at a show together.
It was Neil Hamburger, the Legendary Stardust Cowboy and Extreme
Elvis.
Oh, Extreme -- yeah, he told me about Extreme
Elvis. A grotesque experience, I hear?
Well, actually Extreme Elvis was pretty well-behaved
that night. I've heard that his other shows can include a lot of
bodily fluids and things.
After The Light Is Flickering, have you
recorded any more stuff of just your own like that?
Yeah, I've got tons of it. It's just that it's not
gonna come out on Alternative Tentacles. What I'm probably gonna
do is include a lot of it on the retrospective CD I do. I got a
little tired of putting stuff out on Alternative Tentacles and getting
no promotion at all.
I guess when you decided to reform the Dead Kennedys,
I guess you kinda knew there'd be the Biafra camp being really vocal
and bitter about it. Does that kind of thing affect you emotionally?
I mean, did it upset you, or did you just kinda let it roll off
and say, "Look, we were the original members"?
We talked to as many as we could. Basically, there
would be like people outside the club picketing, and we'd go outside
and talk to them. And they'd say, "Well, you did this and this
and this!" And we'd say, "Where'd you hear that?"
"Alternative Tentacles' web site!" "Well
did
you read about it on any other web site?" "No, where would
we go?" "Well, you could try the Dead Kennedys' site;
then you'll see two sides to the story." "Well, what's
the other side?" "Well, the way we see it, blah blah blah."
"Well, that's bullshit!" "Why's it bullshit? Because
Biafra told you so? I mean, come on. We're not telling you what
to think. We just want you to go out there and find all the stuff
written about it so you can make up your own mind."
And if they start to see our point of view, maybe
we'll throw 'em on the guest list. Let 'em see the show and make
up their own mind about whether or not we're the Dead Kennedys.
We knew that there're gonna be people -- a lot of people siding
with Jello, and a lot of people are really passionate about the
group, which is fine.
Biafra always made it seem like the band all
had the same exact beliefs about everything, just the way he was
so vocal about it.
We had certainly pretty much all aligned against
certain political ideas that aren't too terribly brave to go up
against. Let's see
government corruption. Corporate running
of the world is not right. It's not too tough to come up and say
that -- a lot of people don't want to hear it that are people in
power -- but basically, if we made a ripple, it was as a result
of people picking up on our ideas when they heard the records or
came to the shows. One of the ways that I think Biafra has changed
over the years as far as his presentation is that he used to tell
people to think for themselves and now he kinda tells them what
to think.
Have you followed his, umm --
Spoken word stuff?
Yeah, or even the music stuff he's done since.
I follow the music stuff and I follow the spoken
word stuff. The music stuff doesn't impress me as much as the spoken
word stuff. Basically, music isn't his strong point. That's one
of the things that shows that the Dead Kennedys all contributed
to our sound. I think the music he's put out by himself is the same
as the music I've put out by myself -- it's totally different from
the Dead Kennedys. It was only when we all worked together that
there was definitely a Dead Kennedys sound.
The people who are arguing against you guys playing
without him -- are they mostly kids that are so passionate?
That depends on what you mean by "kids."
I'm not sure where the cut-off is.
Oh! Ha! Ummm
16, 18
. I just wonder
if people who are in the working world and realize the problem of
economics and realize that he was keeping money from you guys --
if they would be as adamant about you guys playing as the Dead Kennedys
as kids who are living with their parents still or who kinda just
believe whatever they read on his site.
Yeah. As you live longer and see that corruption
isn't limited to just major corporations, basically -- one of Ray's
favorite things to point out is that you shouldn't judge a company
by its size as much as by its content or its actions. Corporations
aren't necessarily more corrupt than small companies in every situation.
But even if that were the case, it's not like
you, Ray and D.H. are a big corporation against Alternative Tentacles!
I mean, you're just three guys who were kinda being ripped off.
Yeah, that's true. And we had to go through an awful
lot of fighting to get what was due us. Basically, it was a reality
check. Not only for us, but for Biafra, who continues to insist
that he's innocent of any wrongdoing.
And he keeps losing! If he's constantly losing,
obviously you guys are in the right. It's not like the court is
anti-Biafra for some reason.
You would think that he'd garner that logic after
a while.
And their web site begs for money! Have you seen
that? "Oh, the Dead Kennedys keep suing me!" You know?
And that's the other thing -- he's suing us! He's
still got two suits pending against us. We haven't sued him since
the initial suit. We've done countersuits against what he's filed
against us, because you have to or you gotta take it. But we have
not initiated anything since the first one.
Do you think he thinks what he's doing is right?
I'm sure he does.
Oh okay.
I'm sure that, you know -- and again I can't get
inside his head -- but I'm imagining that people that go to such
extremes have basically convinced themselves that they're up against
evil, and everybody's against them. But some day somebody will realize
the truth and exonerate them.
What in his view is right about the situation?
Did he make an offer?
You'd have to talk to him about it!
Oh okay. Alright. But the whole deal about he
keeps claiming that "Oh! Yeah, I offered to give them the money
and instead they sued me!"
Well, he didn't offer to give us the money. That
was part of the thing. I can't talk about what went on in the negotiations,
because I'm legally bound not to talk about it. Whether or not those
negotiations were agreed to, I'm not allowed to talk about it. But
I can say that they never offered to make it --
Even close to the right --
Yeah, yeah. The thing that we're really trying to
get is just his admission -- Biafra just saying, "I'm sorry.
I don't know what made me think of this. I don't know what made
me do this. I don't know why I dragged you guys through court. I
don't know what I was thinking. I'm sorry, and can we be friends?"
And we'd say, "Yeah." That's what we'd like this thing
to come around to.
We were friends until this all happened. That's
why it was my idea to invite him to our 25th anniversary show. It
wasn't an attempt to take advantage of him or trick him in any way.
I just hoped he would be willing to bury the hatchet and stop this
cycle that we've locked ourselves into. We're not out to break Biafra.
We're not out to get Alternative Tentacles. We're just out to have
him realize that if you're gonna talk the talk, you gotta walk the
walk.
And if indeed it had come out all against us, and
we were imagining it, I would hope that we would have had the presence
of mind to say, "Gee, I guess we were wrong." But
basically the facts got presented to judge after judge, and then
a jury and a whole bunch of different judges, and they all agreed
that we were right. I wish it had never happened, but it did and
I think the legacy of the Dead Kennedys has been affected.
I know that people want to think that the world
is perfect, but eventually we all find out that nothing is perfect.
We try as hard as we can to do things and when we play, we try to
give everyone as good a show as possible. I mean, it bothers me
that there's still people who think we got together and said, "Oh
I'm gonna get in there and make as much money --" THAT'S NOT
THE POINT! We're doing this so that all the people who never got
a chance to see us can see us, and for the joy of playing the songs.
Because it's fun! We have a blast! The first time we did it, we
were scared shitless going up there, but it felt good and all the
people there seemed to really enoy it. So we were like, "Alright!"
And the crowd everywhere you go, the crowds are
really excited about it, really into it?
Yeah, there hasn't been a show yet that people didn't
really like it. And the thing too, the thing that we didn't do much
after the shows back then -- it was a really different world back
then, but what we do now is we go out and -- people didn't ask for
autographs back then, you know? But after shows now, people always
come up to us asking for autographs. I sign more autographs after
one show -- a new show -- than I did the entire time before, and
it was not that I refused autographs; people just didn't care about
autographs. "Sure, I'll give you an autograph!" I
imagine it's the same for Biafra too. It's just a different world
now. Maybe people back then thought it was uncool to ask for an
autograph; I don't know. There you go!
Cool! I guess you've got another guy calling
you in a minute, right?
Yeah, I guess so.
Okay. Okay, I'll get this thing written up and
make sure you get a few copies of the magazine. It'll also be online.
Great!
Okay, thank you so much for your time!
Sure, Mark. Thanks for, you know, keeping an open
mind.
Yeah. It's tough when you're a kid, but when
you get older, you understand things a little more.
And you don't like to hear that as a kid. "When
you grow up, you'll understand."
Yeah, I know!
"No no, I know everything now!" And you're
looking at yourself at 30. Wait until you're 40. And it doesn't
have to be growing towards cynicism. You can grow towards more ideological
thinking. But you also learn that putting your ideologies into action
is a lot harder, in the big picture.
Yeah, and that there are two sides.
Yeah. And one side may be 10% right and have some
truth. There's no black and white.
Yeah.
Well, I guess there is black and white as long as
George Bush's friends are running the country.
It's, it's awf -- yeah. It is; that's a whole
other conversation there.
The Republican recall election of Gray Davis with
Schwarzenegger is just another attempt to detract attention away
from the fact that they're not finding anything in Iraq.
Um-hm. And more and more of us are getting killed
in Iraq.
What's that?
And more and more soldiers are getting killed
in Iraq.
Yep. Meanwhile, the big issue in the recall election
is the California energy crisis, which was created by Bush and Cheney's
friends at Enron. But let's not talk about that! Let's just blame
it on Gray Davis. It's a big lie.
The media's, well, you know --
There is some stuff getting through, but the media
unfortunately is under the control of just a few corporations. And
that goes straight on down to NPR and PBS. And then the alternative
press has problems sometimes with people that want something to
be true so much that they'll change the facts of the story to support
their "truth."
Yeah, that's the problem with a lot of underground
press is that you don't know --
Oh, here's the other guy. Hold on just a sec.
Okay!
(pause)
It was a telemarketer. It's like, you have to back
stuff up with facts and documents if you're telling a story, an
argument that goes against major media. Because if you don't have
solid facts and stuff like that, it plays right into their hands,
you know? They look at it like, "Oh, look what they're saying
now" and they have all the facts to back up that what you're
saying is wrong. You can't do that. You have to report stuff only
when you have real solid backup, because the people you're going
up against will be looking to debunk you. Is journalism your main
interest?
(Silence - I hadn't heard his question because
he was speaking so quietly)
Are you there?
Yeah, so do you trust --
I was saying, is journalism your main thing? Is
that what you want to do with your life?
Umm, no. I mean, I was in like high-tech PR for
about seven years, so I know that side of it. I just -- the more
you follow the national news, what's surprising is that every once
in a while, they DO criticize Bush, which seems really unexpected,
and I'm not sure how certain stories get through when others don't.
Well, they gotta make it look like they're not being
one-sided, so they'll get a little thing out there that won't be
terribly damaging, like "Oh, he made a problem with syntax,"
and unfortunately the majority of Americans are easily led and just
want to basically be told what to do and told what to think, and
not have to do a whole lot of work thinking for themselves.
I got really paranoid shortly after September
11th. I'm here in New York, so it was pretty emotional around here,
of course, and it was to the point where the FBI would say, "You
know what? We admit it. We blew it. We made a mistake." And
I would see that in the news and go, "Well, if they're admitting
it, then it wasn't a mistake. They knew about this and they let
it happen and they're trying to cover it up." You know, it's
hard to --
Ha! Yeah, you tend to fall into the trap of "No
matter what they say, it's the opposite."
Yeah, exactly.
You can't fall into that trap either, you know?
Because sometimes they do tell the truth -- they'll throw a truth
in every once in a while just to throw you! And you get the feeling
of 'us or them,' as opposed to people vs. you know
I don't
know, as opposed to, you know. Yeah, the FBI are not gonna give
the truths that are unflattering to the FBI unless they know it's
something they can't cover up. So let's admit it and make it look
like, "Okay, we're great guys. We admit it. You can trust the
FBI because we're admitting this."
And the whole idea of Bush being able to --
It's PR!
You know, the idea of them not having to say
who was in the energy policy meetings and not having to release
the presidential papers and all this because of national security
-- it's just such bullshit! It's really hard to deal with! I guess
you've been dealing with it -- you've been following this stuff
since Reagan, I guess.
Oh, I've been following this stuff since -- you
know, I'm 54, man! I've been following it since -- I've been seriously
following it since, I think the thing that slapped my face into
thinking about the world as being affected by larger forces, and
attracted me to the name "Dead Kennedys" was, you know,
the Kennedy assassination. That event brought about a big change
in the way people thought about how government worked. I mean, it's
still being covered up. I definitely don't believe the uhh
what do you call it --
Oh, you mean the
the Commission report?
The Commission, yeah. It was ridiculous, you know?
Yeah. It was one person! Nobody else was involved!
Ignore the man on the grassy knoll!
So you've been following it that long. So where
does George W. fit in? Reagan and Nixon and --
George W. is a puppet for people much more powerful
than him. Cheney doesn't want to be president. He wants to be running
the show from the background. Rockefeller ran for President only
when he knew that he wouldn't get elected. The closest he got to
being President was vice-president under Ford. He'd much rather
not have the scrutiny put on him.
The people that are actually running the show are
not the President. It's pretty dicey to say this, but you gotta
give Clinton a certain degree of credit, although he Gray Davis-ed
himself by trying to please too many people when he got in. He fucked
up. I think "The American President" was Hollywood screaming
at him, "Lookit, we put you in -- do the fuckin' right thing!
This is how you should behave, okay?" But no, he was bought
off.
Carter still seems to have some sort of sense of
integrity as far as presidents go. And Carter lost because he wouldn't
be a puppet. You gotta understand that the people who are really
in charge are the corporations. They just want to buy up Boardwalk
and Park Place and build hotels and crush everybody. And then they've
won. And it doesn't affect them if they lose because it's just a
game and they still have four billion more dollars to play with.
It's crazy!
Ted Kennedy has more power in Congress than he would
as President. He can get people to vote the way he wants them to
vote. I'm sure he has dirt on everybody. "Oh jeez, it would
be terrible if your wife found out that you were sleeping with blah
blah blah." That gives him more control and power, because
if he was president, people would be taking potshots at him. I mean,
they didn't go after John for his affairs, but they'd go after Ted.
Yeah. Do you think any of the Democratic guys
right now are looking good?
I think that the Green Party is the most rational
and logical party. I think Nader -- this isnt a popular thing,
but I dont think he would have not lost face and helped things
a lot if he had, a week before the election, thrown his support
to Gore. It would have been that much harder for George Bush to
win the election.
That's the other thing too. Think about that whole
Bush thing. Why did they run George Bush instead of Jeb Bush? It
makes you wonder what the fuck did Jeb Bush do, because he's the
smarter of the two and he's the one that was more electable. What
the fuck did he do that they didn't want to run him for President?
Was he snorting coke off of babies' bellies or something? I have
no idea, but it must have been horrendous for them to have run George
for president!
So these automated voting machines -- are they
really ...
You're asking me if the automated voting machines
are tamperable? Oh, everything's tamperable. Everything's manipulable
by the powers that be.
So what do you think is the overall goal of this
shadow government or whatever behind Bush? Is their overall goal
just to keep --
It's not a government. That's the whole thing. It's
just corporations. See, that's the whole thing. People get sidetracked
into thinking that boundaries of countries actually have a reality.
If we really had a world government, what would happen is that the
people who would be up for election would be heads and CEOs of the
largest corporations. That is what's controlling our government
such as it is -- our administration. Basically they're protecting
their fortunes and making sure that things just keep going smoothly
for them around the world.
For their own pers --
That's their goal.
Their goal is their own pers --
They have a goal to be re-elected. That's their
only goal -- they don't give three shits about anything in America
except that they get re-elected so they can propagate more projects
for their corporations.
But is that an attempt to keep -- I mean, I'm
just trying to think, "Is there any way this could be -- they
could think this is the right thing to do?" Are they trying
to keep the U.S. economy up?
There was a great Simpsons episode back in '92,
I think. They had the Republican convention and the Democratic convention.
At the Democratic convention, they had a big banner that said, "We
have no leaders." And the GOP convention had a banner saying
"Just plain evil."
HA!
And they nailed it! "We have no leaders"
vs. "Just plain evil." And I think when you're talking
about black and white, that's why I said, "Well, maybe there
is black and white." I don't buy into evil in the way of, you
know, vampires -- I don't buy into that shit any more than anybody
with a decent grip on reality should. But I do buy into the evil
of using weaponry to starve people for the sake of money.
Do you think that they're trying to help AMERICA
at the expense of everyone? Or THEM PERSONALLY at the expense of
everyone? Are they going after the oil because they can make profit
off of it or because they're afraid the U.S. is --
They don't care what happens to anybody after they
die except their own ancestors, I think. James Watt, way back when
they were stripping the forests, was asked, "What about protecting
the environment for future generations?" And his response was,
"Well, we don't have to worry about that because Armageddon
is on the way."
HE REALLY SAID THAT?!
Yep.
Oh boy.
(pause)
Yeeeeah, I gotta go.
Ha! Thank you for this call.
But it's been nice talking to you.
Yeah, you too.
None of it's solvable without a major change in
the way people perceive what's going on around them. And I don't
know what it's gonna take to make people get smarter. If you give
people their TV and keep beer prices low, most Americans are happy.
I mean, gas prices have gone up to what -- $2.50 per gallon or something
like that?
Yep.
And people are still, "I'm hopping in my SUV
and I don't care if it costs me 75 dollars. Fill 'er up! It's Labor
Day and I'm going to Yosemite! Because it's beautiful there!"
And how many people are gonna lose their jobs
before they realize he's not maybe taking care --
We're gonna have to get pretty close to living in
-- a good portion of people experiencing poverty before anybody
takes action. And hopefully they'll be literate enough to express
their anger at poverty in constructive ways to the powers that be
that control the poverty. It's been a long time coming.
We used to talk a lot about anarchy. Anarchy isn't
nihilism. Anarchy means that, if you take care of yourself and take
care of the people around you and are aware of the people around
you and what's going on around you, then you don't need a government
to tell you what to do. It requires responsibility. And the only
place we saw that actually in action working very efficiently was
in Rome.
And the cars in Rome followed no traffic laws, but
you hardly ever heard about any accidents. People are in their cars
banging on their horns making sure people know they're coming. They're
all darting all over the place. If you come to a light and there's
nobody coming, you slow down, but if there's no car coming, you
blow off the light. If there's something coming, you slam on your
brakes, hit the horn and speed up just for the heck of it.
Ha!
But they know you're there, so they have to hang
a left or something. But I mean, you know, if that red light doesn't
make any sense being red and making you sit there for thirty seconds
while you're not getting anything accomplished by it, then that
rule doesn't make any sense so fuck the rule! But you have to be
aware that it's there to protect you and the people around you,
and you have to pay attention to it.
That's odd.
And now I've droned on for an hour and a half.
Nah, that's fine! It's up to me to type this
thing up -- you don't --
Yeah, now you get to do all the work.
Nah, I do really appreciate it though. It's interesting.
I had no idea what you were saying about Rome. That's nuts. They're
not out murdering each other?
No, not really. It's not an anarchist society --
it's just driving, you know. That one specific act of driving a
car through Rome is pure anarchy working effectively. Through Rome
and the outskirts of Italy through -- And it's kinda funny, because
people everywhere have the same attitudes towards waiting at red
lights and not wanting to follow speed limits, but nobody has worked
out what the Romans have worked out! All the people are driving
around and not having road rage basically. I don't know what else
to say about Italy.
It's certainly romantic. Alright, well you have
a --
I believe that's where the word comes from, as a
matter of fact! Okay.
Alright, thank you so much again.
Take care.
You too!
Bye.
Bye.
September 1, 2003.
----
Reader Comments
No Comments.
|